Let's get one thing clear: Rights
are not granted by the government, Their enumeration in the charter of a
state must not be misinterpreted as meaning that the rights so numbered are given
by the state; rather it must be understood that rights are organic to
the person of every man, woman and child: they are inextricably bound with his nature, and, if given
at all, are given by god the creator if such there be. In the evolutionary sense nature mandates that self preservation
be
central to life and the preservation of the species.
Therefore the most
significant of these rights is the right to bear arms: for the state
that governs an armed populace governs men, while the state that governs a disarmed populace
that they have shorn of arms and the understanding of their rights merely
herds human cattle.
It stands to reason that men wanting to pride themselves on
the excellence of their own character in service of governance of their
fellows would prefer to govern men, that is, an armed populace cognizant of their
rights, rather than a populace of the impotent
and ignorant, that is, a herd of human cattle: there is honor and nobility in the former, and only shame in the
latter. Which side are you on?
Question the Civil Rights "Victories" You've
Made: What Have You Lost?
Understand this: Gun prohibitionists want
you
to suffer more crime, not less:
In the United States in
those States without Concealed Carry Laws, that is with more restrictive
laws on guns, the people suffer
- Violent Crime 81% higher
- Murder 86% higher
- Rape 25% higher
- Assault 82% higher
- Robbery 105% higher
- Auto Theft 60% higher
That's from an exhaustive study of county level
crime statistics from all 3,054 counties in the U.S. from 1977 through
1992 by the John Lott and David Mustard. They found that the
relationship of guns to crime levels was inversely proportional and had
a compelling positive
correlation. i.e., causation: the easier it is for citizens to lawfully obtain, and carry,
concealed firearms the lower the crime rate.
That should end the debate with gun control
advocates forever, for if they persist in spouting their delusional
hypocrisy, or lies that what they want is a just and peaceful society,
be it known that they are
actually advocating more violence and crime, and demonstrate by their
position their utter inferiority of intellect and moral character to
engage in any meaningful dialogue with anybody. Cow bellow, and
sheep bleat, to their speech no more importance should be attached.
Think of the children before listening to these hateful control freaks
and their moronic henchmen speak.
Imagine instead
the benefits of the right to bear arms being universally accepted on
planet Earth: The benefits to the global economy would amount to
trillions of dollars and millions of lives saved.
